Sensitivity of Chest CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RT-PCR

Noncontrast chest CT may be considered for early diagnosis of viral disease, although viral nucleic acid detection using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) remains the...

Share this

Noncontrast chest CT may be considered for early diagnosis of viral disease, although viral nucleic acid detection using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) remains the standard of reference. The purpose of a study published in Radiology was to compare the sensitivity of chest CT and viral nucleic acid assay at initial patient presentation.

51 patients (29 men and 22 women) were included with median age of 45 years. All patients had throat swab (45 patients) or sputum samples (6 patients) followed by one or more RT-PCR assays. The average time from initial disease onset to CT was 3 +/- 3 days; the average time from initial disease onset to RT-PCR testing was 3 +/- 3 days. 36/51 patients had initial positive RT-PCR for COVID-19. 12/51 patients had COVID-19 confirmed by two RT-PCR nucleic acid tests (1 to 2 days), 2 patients by three tests (2-5 days) and 1 patient by four tests (7 days) after initial onset.

50/51 (98%) patients had evidence of abnormal CT compatible with viral pneumonia at baseline while one patient had a normal CT. Of 50 patients with abnormal CT, 36 (72%) had typical CT manifestations (e.g. peripheral, subpleural ground glass opacities, often in the lower lobe and 14 (28%) had atypical CT manifestations. In this patient sample, difference in detection rate for initial CT (50/51 [98%, 95% CI 90-100%]) patients was greater than first RT-PCR (36/51 [71%, 95%CI 56-83%]) patients (p<.001).

 

In this study, the sensitivity of chest CT was greater than that of RT-PCR (98% vs 71%, respectively, p<.001). The reasons for the low efficiency of viral nucleic acid detection may include: 1) immature development of nucleic acid detection technology; 2) variation in detection rate from different manufacturers; 3) low patient viral load; or 4) improper clinical sampling. The reasons for the relatively lower RT-PCR detection rate in our sample compared to a prior report are unknown.  The results support the use of chest CT for screening for COVD-19 for patients with clinical and epidemiologic features compatible with COVID-19 infection particularly when RT-PCR testing is negative.

Source:

https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200432

Related Post

Disruption of body’s internal clock linked with mood disorders

Daily circadian rhythms govern fundamental physiological and behavioural functions. Greater disease risks arising from circadian

Foods that help you sleep.

Foods that contain melatonin, tryptophan, certain carbohydrates and magnesium are those that aid sleep, but

The Just Right Pillow for You - Featured Image

The “Just Right” Pillow for You

Struggling to stay comfortable while using your CPAP machine? The right pillow can make a

Severe COVID and Flu May Raise Lung Cancer Risk Years Later, But Vaccines Can Help

Severe COVID and Flu May Raise Lung Cancer Risk Years Later, But Vaccines Can Help

Groundbreaking new research reveals that serious respiratory infections can leave lasting changes in the lungs

ABC Radio interviews

Hot Weather and Sleep

As Brisbane, and Queensland more broadly, heads into some unseasonable heat, our friends at ABC

World Sleep Day 2024

Our friends at ABC radio called the Wesley Hospital Sleep Disorders Centre today to chat

ABC Radio – Do you share a blanket with your bed partner?

Our friends at ABC radio called our Sleep Unit Manager Phil Teuwen to talk about